Starter
$149
per release
250+ outlets · 48 hrs
Industry solution · Fintech
Press Release Distribution for Fintech Companies
A fintech release sits between two audiences that don't read the same way — finance journalists checking regulatory accuracy and product press covering the feature. TS Newswire routes fintech news to outlets built for both.
- releases checked for licensing/charter language before send
- 100%
- typical fintech release turnaround on Business tier
- 12–24 hrs
Payments, banking-as-a-service, lending and insurtech announcements carry a different burden than most B2B software news: a claim about interest rates, transaction volume or a banking charter gets checked against public filings before a finance editor will run with it. TS Newswire's fintech distribution track exists because a release that reads fine to a growth marketer can still get held at outlets that cover regulated financial products for a living — the standard of proof is simply higher.
Licensing status is the detail that trips up more fintech releases than any other. A company operating under a partner bank's charter, a money transmitter license, or an EMI license in a specific jurisdiction needs to describe that relationship accurately — "bank" and "banking partner" aren't interchangeable to an editor who covers this space closely, and getting it wrong is the fastest way to have a release quietly declined rather than published.
Where releases go wrong
Common problems in Fintech distribution
"Bank" vs. "banking partner" gets confused
Fintechs operating on a partner bank's charter need to describe that relationship precisely — outlets check this before publishing.
Growth numbers need a measurement period
Transaction volume, user counts or revenue growth stated without a timeframe or source read as unverifiable to a finance editor.
Licensing claims vary by jurisdiction
A money transmitter or EMI license valid in one market doesn't automatically extend to a release claiming multi-market coverage.
Product news competes with funding news for attention
A feature launch or partnership announcement gets less editorial interest than a funding round unless it's framed around what changed for users, not the company.
How it works
Our Fintech review process
01
Licensing and charter language check
Any claim involving a bank charter, money transmitter license or regulatory registration is checked for accuracy — vague "we're a bank" framing gets sent back for the precise relationship.
02
Metrics verification
Growth, volume and revenue figures are checked for a stated measurement period and source before the release proceeds.
03
Outlet matching
Releases are routed to finance-trade press for the regulatory and product detail, plus general business outlets for market-level coverage.
04
Pickup tracking
The dashboard shows which outlets picked up the release and whether it indexed in Google News, typically within hours of distribution.
Sample outlet mix
Representative outlets for Business & Finance
A sample of the outlets in this vertical — the exact mix for a given release depends on tier and outlet availability at send time.
| Outlet | Type | Domain authority |
|---|---|---|
| Business Insider | News site | 93 |
| Yahoo Finance | Wire | 93 |
| MarketWatch | News site | 92 |
| AP News | Wire | 91 |
Editorial standards
What clears review, what doesn't
We accept
- Bank charter or licensing relationship described accurately (e.g. "banking services provided by [Partner Bank], Member FDIC")
- Growth and volume metrics sourced to a specific measurement period
- Named spokesperson with title, ideally someone who can speak to the regulatory detail
- Interest rate or fee claims that reflect current, unconditional terms
- Jurisdiction-specific licensing stated where the release claims multi-market coverage
We reject
- FDIC-insurance language applied to the fintech itself rather than its partner bank
- Promotional rates presented without the conditions that apply
- Unsourced growth or transaction-volume claims
- Licensing claims that don't match the company's actual registration status
Compliance detail
Licensing language that gets fintech releases held
The most common reason a fintech release gets sent back for revision is licensing language that overstates what the company is actually authorized to do. "FDIC-insured" applies to deposits held at a partner bank, not to the fintech itself, unless it holds a charter directly — conflating the two is a claim outlets increasingly catch before publishing, since it's been a recurring source of regulatory action against fintechs in recent years.
Interest rate and yield claims get similar scrutiny. A stated APY needs to reflect what's actually offered at time of publication, not a promotional rate with conditions buried elsewhere — and if the rate is tied to a specific balance tier or account type, the release needs to say so rather than lead with the headline number alone.
Pricing
Choose a tier
Recommended for Fintech
Licensing and metrics verification take editorial time — Business tier's turnaround builds that in.
Business
$349
per release
600+ outlets · 24 hrs
Premium
$649
per release
1,240+ outlets · 6 hrs
-
Crypto, blockchain, Web3 and NFT releases go through our dedicated Crypto & Web3 distribution track, which handles the category-specific eligibility checks that general fintech outlets don't apply the same way.
Free account
See all 1,240+ outlets, pricing included.
No card, no sales call, no obligation. Search the network, preview a sample release, and decide whether to submit yourself or hand it to our team.